ENTERPRISE SAVINGS FRAMEWORK

If One Bun Can Hold Two Hot Dogs,
What Else Are We Overpaying For?

A CFO-certified guide to reducing costs in ways that technically work, emotionally don’t, and culturally devastate.

✅ Optics-first savings ✅ Spreadsheet-positive ❌ Human-compatible ⚠️ Legally adjacent
Case Study: Bun Consolidation Event (BCE-2018)

During a company cookout, the CFO returned from the grill holding two hot dogs in one bun.

Costs saved
$0.23
*estimated
Trust remaining
100%
still mostly here

Every “optimization” increases savings and reduces trust.

This framework was born that day.

Low-Visibility Cost Synergies

Employee Decimalization

Convert employees into fractional headcount units. Layoffs are now “rounding corrections.”

Morale impact: theoretical

Monitor Time-Sharing

Engineers reserve monitors in 30‑minute blocks. Idle pixels are waste.

Productivity measured per pixel-hour

Bathroom-as-a-Service

Restrooms are centralized. Walking builds character.

Steps added: 4,000/day

Meeting Chair Rotation

No chairs provided. Standing meetings end faster.

OSHA compliance: pending

Keyboard Sharing Program

Each team receives one keyboard. Collaboration increases by force.

Germs: cross‑functional

Expense Report Fatigue

Add 14 mandatory fields. Employees stop submitting expenses entirely.

Savings realized: $9,400

Executive Decision Tools

Tip: edit cuts.json to add your own CFO cuts.

Shareholder Narrative Simulator

Click below to generate a justification that sounds strategic.

Morale Impact Estimator

Estimated morale impact: Acceptable (until next quarter)

Compliance & Governance

SOC 2 (emotionally) GAAP-adjacent SOX‑aware HR‑informed (after) Ethics Committee (calendar invite sent)

All cost optimizations reviewed internally by finance.

FAQ

Is this legal?

Legal has been looped in via CC.

Will employees notice?

Not immediately. Exit interviews take time.

Does this actually save money?

It saves confidence.

Why the hot dogs?

Because culture is expensive.